🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.