🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing harmful online content contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

While this international conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.